Now and again we read of the claim that the Catholic Church was infiltrated by Jewish forces. To prove the Jewish origin of some popes is headed. How absurd that is, one can see from the centuries-old ecclesiastical anti-Judaism, which reached even into the last century and is set only after the Second Vatican Council, an official closing point, and the ongoing turmoil between the Vatican and the Jewish community. Examples from recent history would include:
The protest against the Jewish community
- the Latin Good Friday prayer
- the beatification of Pope Pius XII.
- the lifting of the excommunication of Bishop Williamson of the SSPX
Holocaust denier Horst Mahler claimed before his going to prison at all, the "Jewish conspirators" would be with the debate about Pius brother Williamson "our" Pope and attack the whole of Christendom. How it would fit with a supposed Jewish infiltrated Catholic Church, as it is claimed, not by Mahler but sometimes from the same area, probably remains a mystery.
The lifting of the excommunication of the brothers Pius and the Holocaust denier Williamson were shown to the public as a breakdown of the Pope, which in this Case was simply bad advice. Was it a mistake, or is behind a particular position?
Alan Posener: Trying the affair of Williamson and the Pius brothers dismiss as a breakdown, was a stupid move by Benedict's defenders. For if the pope does not know what he does, he is unsuitable as pope. Ratzinger knows, of course, but exactly what he does. He was already involved as head of the CDF, the issue of Pius brothers and knows their writings. Let me be clear: the SSPX is not a conservative, but an openly reactionary organization that preserves the ecclesiastical anti-Judaism, which is more or less institutionally anti-Semitic words. The Brotherhood advocated the abolition of the secular state and its replacement by a theocracy similar to Iran would, drugs, prostitution, pornography, blasphemy, homosexuality, and so on and ban the death penalty re-introduce. Benedict knows this, yet he runs the approach to these people and comes to meet them far, for example, with the revaluation of the Latin liturgy, the abolition by the Second Vatican Council, ostensibly led to the elimination of the Pius-brothers of the church. In reality, however, fit the Pius brothers not the whole direction of the council. And it also does not fit Benedict.
[...]
Has by Pope Benedict changed the tone towards the Jews? There were fierce criticism of his speech at Auschwitz ...
Alan Posener: Well, there was also praise for the speech by the Jews, for example, by Henryk M. Broder. He praised Benedict, which he spoke of the "evil", but this does every Christian when he says the Our Father. And Auschwitz was not just an expression of "evil" per se, but a concrete ideology, the ideology of racism and antisemitism. Where the modern anti-Semitism is based in turn on a two thousand year old tradition of Jewish anti-Christianity. which, however, Benedict spoke in Auschwitz nor of the guilt of Pope Pius XII, who was silent on the Holocaust, or the Germans who helped Hitler to power. Instead, he put the Germans as victims of a "small band of criminals" is, and the Catholic Church as a bulwark against Nazism. Here history is being rewritten.
Benedict is not anti-Semitic, but he denies the link between anti-Judaism and antisemitism, he is blind and deaf to the criticism from the Jewish side, at about the beatification of Pius XII or the new Latin Good Friday prayer in which Catholics for the conversion of Jews pray to Christianity.
http://www.heise.de/tp/r4/artikel/31/31468/1.html
Rabbi Homolka: "The Catholic Church has its anti-Semitism is not under control"
http://www.spiegel.de/politik/deutschland/0, 1518,542556,00 html
Homolka has right here in my opinion.. The justification has less to do with the fact that the Jews see as a chosen people is not respected, but because here actually addressed a sore point: the historical anti-Judaism the church was revived. In the Good Friday prayer mentioned it is a re-authorization an old, traditional conflicts evocative passage. It is really rather conciliatory words - they deceive only pretend to be that - an emphasis on religious differences, and in my opinion, a clear, officially propagated signal, that the Jewish religion is not regarded as fully satisfying. Why then deliberately stand in this hornets' nest had, it might come to their own at any conclusions.
The RCC has not really changed, even though it may appear to many Sun Many of the old council decisions are implicitly still valid. The accusation that Jews were "murderers of God" and the like, which was then exploited by the Nazis for propaganda, is actually a centuries-old doctrine of the RCC, the official Second only to the Vatican Council was abolished. Christian critics such as Dave Hunt sometimes doubted the sincerity of the alleged conversion of the Roman Catholic Church since Vatican II - and were sometimes even by Pope Benedict confirmed (*). Some Christian fundamentalists in America "pray" by the way also for the Jews, which they attributed think the fate, in the Armageddon either to convert to the true faith or to go to hell. Support of Israel and the invasion of Iran in this messianic vision only exploitable steps to the goal.
On the website you can also read about the Vatican officially, that the RCC continues to the only true church holds. In the end, it is well beyond the fact that all those who the pope as the supreme ruler of God and the doctrines of the RCC (eg, Eucharist, Holy Communion liturgy) are not accepted as absolutely valid to regard as heretics and are handled accordingly.
At 31 March 2007, Cardinal Tarcisio Bertone, Secretary of State confirmed the rumors that the Pope would soon release a motu proprio that allowed the priests the celebration of Mass according to the pre-conciliar Missale Romanum of 1962, again in general.
[...]
(1) The Missale Romanum of 1962 contains the Good Friday prayer "For the conversion of the Jews "(Pro conversione Iudaeorum). Even if this Missal which the Jews downgrading of terms" are deleted faithless "(perfidus) or" unbelief "(Perfidia) corresponds to the Good Friday prayer otherwise the form of the text, as in the Good Friday liturgy prayed since the Middle Ages. The fact that the "blindness" (obcaecatio) of the Jewish people are talking and that "in darkness" (tenebrae), convert it blatantly the Council's Declaration Nostra Aetate "is contrary [...]
[...]
It is obvious what was done with a re-authorization of the Tridentine Missal: a prolonged disruption of the second since Vatican Council so hopefully begun in Catholic-Jewish dialogue. Many dedicated personal and theological efforts would be made on both sides deliberately destroyed. We hope that Pope Benedict XVI. not allow this corruption of the Christian-Jewish relations.
http://www.christenundjuden.org/de/?item=590
(*)
Benedict, who attended Vatican II as a young theologian, has long complained about what he Consider the erroneous interpretation of the council by liberals, saying it was not a break from the past but rather a renewal of church tradition .
http://www.religionnewsblog.com/18698/catholic-church-2
The Pope and the Jews
http://www.ardmediathek.de/ard/servlet/content/460876
Constantine's Sword
http://v.youku.com/v_show/ id_XNzAzMzY3MzI =. html
0 comments:
Post a Comment